posted on July 22nd, 2009 by Greg Allard in Greg's Comments on the Internet
I tested this out with a simple many to many example and I am not getting the soft deleted objects returned. With objects = SoftDeleteManager the many to many queries will be using get_query_set() which won’t return the soft deleted records. I might need to see an example of how you are getting the deleted results to be able to figure out what is going on. I tried it with some_object.related_things.all() and the returned set won’t have deleted related_things.
Read more comments by Greg Allard
posted on July 22nd, 2009 by Twitter / greg_allard in Greg's Tweets
greg_allard: loaded up the kindle with some books (a lot of free ones) so I have enough to read for the long flight to hawaii
posted on July 10th, 2009 by Twitter / greg_allard in Greg's Tweets
greg_allard: @ChetBortz I use both of those. I can answer any questions if you want to know more.
posted on July 10th, 2009 by Twitter / greg_allard in Greg's Tweets
greg_allard: @ChetBortz http://slicehost.com if you know howto setup a server or webfaction is setup already. my wf affiliate link: http://bit.ly/2jVL5f
posted on July 9th, 2009 by Greg Allard in Greg's Comments on the Internet
I tried it without the LocationMatch directives and it works with just having AliasMatch in there for the static locations.
I didn’t expect that WSGIDaemonProcess wouldn’t expand the python_project_name. I was doing that so that each project would have a different process so touching one wsgi file wouldn’t effect another project. It seemed like it was working like that.
If you can figure out a better way of doing this that would be awesome.
Read more comments by Greg Allard
posted on July 9th, 2009 by Twitter / greg_allard in Greg's Tweets
greg_allard: rt @ivylees Need a pro artist? Check out http://kaceyschwartz.com. She did the nifty frog and bird on Fedorable (http://blog.ivylees.com)